Saturday, April 8, 2023

The Pacific Blue Economy: Towards Economies of Scale

 Joseph Veramu (The author acknowledges the support of the Fiji National University and the Office of the Vice Chancellor in expediting this research.)

One of the challenges of the Pacific is that 90 percent of the total Pacific population live in only 3 nations, namely, PNG, Fiji and the Solomon Islands. 6 nations have populations of less than 20,000 and 6 have populations that are less than 300,000. This raises the point that because of their smallness it makes sense for many Pacific nations to develop economies of scale and form an Economic union.

The Pacific region benefited from economic growth in Asian nations like China, South Korea, Japan and India. It is important that while Pacific nations nurture trade ties to traditional partners like Australia and New Zealand that they also strengthen links with Asia. S&P Global Inc notes that economies in the Asia-Pacific region will dominate global growth in 2023 of approximately 3.5%. This growth is supported by regional free-trade agreements, efficient supply chains and competitive costs. The Asia region produces 35% of the world’s GDP (Jihye Lee, 2022).

Pacific 2023 Economic Forecast

Asian Development Bank https://www.adb.org/countries/fiji/economy

Pacific economies can anticipate a return to growth from 2023 although fiscal balances, debt sustainability, and inflation needs to be carefully dealt with. Pacific nations need to strike a balance between supporting more jobs and reducing future public debt risks. All Pacific countries are forecast to grow through 2023, with some like Palau seeing bigger growth of 18 per cent in GDP due to a tourism boom. The closure of borders from 2020 - 22 during the pandemic has eased after causing havoc to the tourism-dependent economies of Fiji, Vanuatu, Samoa, Tonga, and Palau. Inflation and global economic uncertainty caused by the Russia – Ukraine conflict will need to be closely monitored as costs of shipping and imports have risen to their highest levels in over 20 years. Although prices have come down slowly in 2023, the tensions are still being felt by the Pacific. Inflationary pressures will start coming down in the first half of 2023, with consumer prices projected to fall in every Pacific Island country except Samoa, where inflation may reach as high as 12 per cent in the second half of 2023, before falling in 2024 (World Bank, 2023).

No longer the hole in the doughnut!

It is becoming clearer that the Pacific is no longer the 'hole of the Asia-Pacific doughnut', and the biggest economies want to engage substantively. China and a group of Pacific nations are working towards formal trade agreements according to an official from the Pacific Islands Forum. Feasibility studies have been carried out and forum members "are interested in getting more preferential market access for Pacific goods". China is world renowned for its expertise in the digital economy area. Some of the biggest Chinese global digital companies can potentially share their capacity, in terms of business-to-business exchanges with Pacific nations. The ten Pacific nations that recognise the one China policy can look at a free-trade agreement (FTA) that slashes import tariffs (Ralph Jennings, 2023).

While a few Pacific nations prefer closer ties to Australia and the United States, due to historical alliances, there is a growing perception that economic development in the islands should transcend traditional alliances. This thinking is based on the notion that  economic development and trade should be based on shared interests rather than shared Cold War ideologies. It is strange for some Pacific leaders to say that they will be aligned to Western powers because they have similar ideologies. This  seems to be a misnomer since Pacific nations represent the colonised and these metropolitan nations represent the colonisers. All Pacific nations should engage with the global community of nations on shared interests rather than on the basis of shared Faith as Christians or shared interest in entertainment media, for example..

Pacific nations want China to build infrastructure for them, and China wants fishing and basing rights. The Chinese Ministry of Commerce indicates that China is working on - or has completed - joint free-trade feasibility studies with Fiji and Papua New Guinea. A China-centred trade pact would add to the Pacific Agreement on Closer Economic Relations Plus (PACER+) that was signed by 10 forum members in 2017 and ratified by three. PACER+ covers goods, services and investment linked to the region's wealthier, larger nations, Australia and New Zealand. The European Union has separate economic "partnership" agreements on trade and development with Papua New Guinea and Fiji. Samoa and the Solomon Islands intend to join these deals, according to the Pacific Islands Forum website. (Ralph Jennings (2023)

The Pacific Islands News Association published an article noting that China’s economic transformation to become an active leader in digital innovation with rapid growth in artificial intelligence and e-commerce is impressive. Mona Mato, the trade commissioner of “Pacific Trade Invest China” whose organisation promotes trade and investment opportunities between Pacific nations and China, said that China has provided a significant step for Pacific Island countries’ export growth. This is in the area of value-added products produced to meet the growing demand in China. According to the Ministry of Commerce, China’s total trade volume with Pacific Island countries with which it has diplomatic ties was US$5.3 billion since 2021, and its accumulated investment has reached US$2.72 billion since November 2022. (PINA, 2022).

Challenges to economic growth

The Pacific Region include some of the world’s smallest and most remote states in the world. Though they differ in population size, geographical spread and development progress, they share challenges and vulnerabilities: high exposure to natural disasters, climate change, and global economic shocks, as well as small or unstable domestic revenues and limited borrowing opportunities. These prevent them from investing in resilient development and seriously hinder their growth prospects. These nations are highly vulnerable developing states that suffer from low economic diversification, often characterised by high dependence on tourism and remittances, volatility due to fluctuations in private income flows and the prices of raw materials, and debt stress situations. Globally small island states make up two thirds of the countries that suffer the highest relative losses – between 1% and 9% of their GDP each year – from natural disasters and are acutely vulnerable to the impacts of climate change.(Oecd.org, 2023)

While small nations have been able to contain the health consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic, they are among the worst hit developing economies in economic and fiscal terms: in 2020 their GDP dropped by 6.9% against 4.8% in all other developing countries. This is mainly due to global contractions in two ocean economy sectors that are key to many small nations: coastal tourism and fisheries. The crisis is worsened by their over-reliance on one or two economic sectors, high fiscal deficits and public debt levels, and significant challenges to the mobilisation of both public and private finance (Oecd.org, 2023)

Small nations vast ocean resources provide some of the most tangible opportunities for a more diverse set of economic activities. However, they will have to deal effectively with the debt situation to preserve fiscal space for investments for a sustainable and resilient recovery. Small nations need to be supported to develop new ocean economy opportunities that can sustainably foster economic diversification. They also need to explore international cost-sharing mechanisms for the conservation and sustainable use of ocean assets and schemes to enhance expertise and risk assessment for emerging ocean-related economic activities. (Oecd.org, 2021)

Small nations can develop sustainable economies by  (i) addressing longstanding debt issues; (ii) embedding sustainability requirements and standards in concessional lending and recovery packages; and (iii) seizing new, sustainable opportunities, including through new long-term development co-operation schemes, such as international cost-sharing mechanisms for the conservation and sustainable use of ocean assets and schemes to enhance expertise and risk assessment for emerging ocean-related economic activities (Oecd, 2021).

The Pacific islands: An overview

The Pacific Islands comprise of 10 million people and a combined GDP of about US$33.77 billion. Pacific nations economies were very seriously affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Their economies contracted by 5.4% between 2019 and 2021. Nations that were dependent on tourism revenues like Fiji, Vanuatu, Samoa and Palau suffered huge two-digit losses due to the pandemic. Other Pacific nations that did not have tourism-based economies also suffered in terms of contracted economies. The positive International Monetary Fund projection showed that Pacific nations will grow at 5.3% over 2022 -2023. However growth will only happen if Pacific nations are able to manage post COVID-19 risks. (Stephen Howes & Huiyuan Liu, 2022)

One huge advantage for the Pacific is that during the pandemic period, there were large remittances sent by Pacific islanders living overseas to their families. The rise in fishing fees brought in much needed cash for many Pacific nations with large fishing waters. There was also an increase in development aid in the Pacific. (For Fiji, the Fiji Sun of 14/5/2021 reported that New Zealand had provided recurrent budget support of NZ$40 million. The Fiji Times of 30/4/21 reported that Australia had given $55 million for budget support.)

Muhammed Balbaa reported in 2022 that Russia’s conflict with Ukraine in February 2022 increased geopolitical tensions between Western countries and Russia. It  lowered global growth expectations due to uncertainty about the effects of the conflict, especially on the global supply chain. The sanctions imposed on Russia by Western nations had a spill over effect on the global economy. This led to energy supply shocks, commodities and trade supply shocks, rising energy, food and commodities prices, thereby causing global inflation in many countries.

The World Bank (2023) reported that after three years of economic slowdown, Pacific nations can expect economic growth to happen in 2023. For this to become a reality, fiscal balances, debt sustainability, and inflation will need to be proactively addressed. Pacific nations will undertake reforms and policies to increase economic growth and sustainable investments, while moving towards a careful balance between creating more jobs and bringing down future debt risks. While all Pacific countries expect to grow in 2023, some nation like Palau, will see huge economic growth of up to 18% in GDP due to growing tourism revenues. Some nations like Solomon Islands, will grow more slowly with an increase of around 2.3%.

The Pacific is not immune from the fallout of the conflict in Ukraine. The World Bank notes  that the high global economic fallout associated with the conflict in Ukraine led to a downward revision in growth forecasts for Pacific economies.  The Pacific was beginning its post-pandemic recovery when it was hit with rising global energy and food prices. These high costs had negatively affected Pacific national budgets, and resulted in inflation, and rising costs of living. The World Bank reported that inflationary pressures will beginning to ease in the first half of 2023 and consumer prices are expected to fall in every Pacific Island country except Samoa, where inflation may reach as high as 12 per cent in the second half of the year, before falling in 2024. (World Bank 2023).

Economies of scale

One of the challenges of the Pacific is that 90 percent of the total Pacific population live in only 3 nations, namely, PNG, Fiji and the Solomon Islands. 6 nations have populations of less than 20,000 and 6 have populations that are less than 300,000

These raises the point that because of their smallness, it makes sense for many Pacific nations to develop economies of scale and form an Economic union (single market).

An Economic Union refers to a group of nations coming together to allow goods and services to move freely in and out of their borders to remove trade barriers and create better employment of skills and resources. It can even allow free movement of production factors such as capital investment and labour and has a common internal and external trading policy. The Union enhances efficiency because production costs are reduced as the free flow of goods, services, and production factors take place. Profit margins can increase as each country produces those goods in which it has a comparative advantage and trades all other goods so that more is produced in total. When the free flow of goods and services happen, and the customs duties are removed, the price of imported goods and services are reduced. More goods and/or services are bought because consumers can afford a greater quantity at the given income level. Because of the free movement of production factors, people have greater employment opportunities leading to higher incomes and better utilization of skills. When, for example, a group of Pacific nations come together in an economic union, they give one another strength because the costs of production are reduced. It makes them more competitive in the regional and global economy, and more profitable. A union also has the advantage of speaking with one unified voice on for example, climate change or their shared values. Examples of such unions are the European Union and the Gulf Cooperation Council in the Middle East. (Shraddha Sureka, 2023)

Tiny Pacific nations might not get the required resources on their own but can do so being part of an Economic Union. Companies in a smaller or a weaker country may not get the needed funding from banks when it tries to generate it on their credit ratings. However, a guarantee from a stronger company in the union helps it do so, allowing such companies to develop their potential to a higher level. When weaker nations can get the resources more quickly, they can speed up their development and become stronger, leading to a betterment in the standard of living of the people of these tiny Pacific nations and gives strength to the economy of the union as a whole. (Shraddha Sureka, 2023).

It makes sense for small Pacific nations to form such an economic union as all tariffs are removed for trade between member countries, creating a uniform market. There are also free movements of labour, enabling workers in a member country to move and work in another member country. Monetary and fiscal policies between member countries are harmonized, which implies a level of political integration. Small Pacific nations coming together can take a step further by having a common currency.

When tiny Pacific nations develop Economies of scale this means that they are coming together to form a larger entity to reduce production costs in the goods they export. As they increase in size (in the economic union) they can lower their production costs and create a competitive advantage by either using those cost savings for increased profits or using the savings to lower the cost of their products to the buyers. Economies of scale develop a competitive advantage for smaller Pacific nations forming a larger unit by bringing out more production units and reducing their overall cost per unit. As they increase their outputs, they can spread their variable and fixed costs over a larger number of goods, lowering the per-unit cost of the product. This means lower prices for buyers. (Andrew Loo 2023 & Indeed.com 2023)

Western nations have not developed fully fledged trade agreements with tiny Pacific nations. The PACER+ Agreement with New Zealand and Australia utilises development aid to support smaller nations who don’t have fully-fledged tradeable  goods and services sectors, and binds the Pacific to the larger metropolitan nations. Bigger nations provide very large amounts of financial aid without proactively nurturing small and micro enterprises to develop a culture of business among the islanders. The aid Western nations give, sometimes becomes like a drug which Pacific nations become addicted to. In the absence of substantive income from trade, these tiny nations must continue to receive this Western aid for national recurrent budgets to run their governments otherwise they go bankrupt. It also forces them to become vassals of these powerful nations in international fora.

To give a concrete example, the Economies of scale can bring together six Pacific nations with populations of 20,000 each to form a Union increasing their total population to 120,000. Or they can have a larger Union with 6 additional nations of populations of 300,000 bringing the grand total to 2 million. (Jean-Paul Rodrigue, 2023).

Some observers have argued that an economic union won’t work in the Pacific because all nations have similar exports such as fish, seaweed, coconuts products, tropical fruits, root-crops and vegetables, for example. This phenomenon is called intraindustry trade where they seem to have identical products and services. Intraindustry trade can be explained in an economic model on monopolistic competition using Economies of scale. So although the products (like fish and seaweed for example) may seem identical, in reality they are not as there are different varieties that appeal to different consumers. Not all fish are born equal, for example, as high-grade tuna and reef fish fetch higher prices with consumers. There is also the potential to value-add coconut trunks into furniture and oil into cosmetic products. (OTPP, 2023)

The notion of the Pacific economies of scale being realised through an economic union of a number of tiny Pacific nations comes at a pivotal time. The ADB (3/2023) notes the following points;

- Exports of Pacific nations have increased by 169%, reaching $9.6 billion in the past 20 years.

-  About 13% of the Pacific population work overseas and they send remittances that form a big slice of Pacific nations / gross domestic product.

- The Pacific is a possible location for tropical retirement homes for Asia’s burgeoning middle class.

In addition, there are untapped marine resources that can be explored for sustainable harvesting. Although being small can be beautiful and attract more tourists to the Pacific, getting bigger (through an economic union) is better as tiny nations combined together can leverage the global market economic system to boost their collective economic growth.

2 - Economic Developments in the Melanesian Group of Countries

Melanesia is located in the South Pacific Ocean and comprises of 2,000 islands stretching from the Arafura Sea in Indonesian waters to the eastern side of the western Pacific Ocean, and from the island of New Guinea in the north to New Caledonia and the surrounding waters to the south. Melanesia’s population is approximately 12 million. Melanesia is divided among five independent countries and one colonial dependency. They are: Fiji, New Caledonia (French Dependency), Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands and Vanuatu. (World Atlas, 2023)

The Melanesian Spearhead Group protects the interests of Melanesian nations. It supports social, political, economic and security interests underscoring the resoluteness, tenacity and resilience of Melanesian people. The MSG is a building block for stronger regional cooperation. Leaders had signed the MSG Treaty on the Protection of Traditional Knowledge and Expressions of Cultures; and the Skills Movement Scheme to facilitate employment of Melanesian people across the MSG borders (Peter Ligaiula, 2023).

The Melanesian Free Trade Agreement (MFTA) is a comprehensive and progressive free trade agreement that aims to achieve regional integration of economies in the Melanesian Spearhead Group (MSG). The regional market offers opportunities for: (a) Trade in Goods to allow free trade on products traded within the MSG countries, with the exception of sugar, salt and mackerel on products subject to meeting the rules of origin criteria (b) Trade in Services. This provides opportunities for trade in services and investment particularly in sectors of importance to achieve development agendas of MSG parties, (c) Labour Mobility. This encourages movement of natural persons to fill skills shortages in the identified categories within MSG countries (MSG, 2023).

Looking at the historical context, Melanesian nations face economic viability exacerbated by geographic isolation, climate change, natural disasters, and aid dependency. In Vanuatu, developing an economy capable of supporting 83 islands who mainly practice subsistence farming is a great challenge.  Vanuatu is ranked as the ninth most tourism-dependent country in the world. Political instability has taken its toll on the tourism industry. Whilst Vanuatu invests in renewable energy and the construction industry is growing, there remains significant challenges. The Solomon Islands had been propped up by Australian aid for the last decade to the tune of over AUD$2 billion thanks to the Regional Assistance Mission to Solomon Islands (RAMSI) occupation. Fiji, with a population just under one million had been affected by natural disasters and the pandemic. Fiji’s economy still largely revolves around fisheries, forestry, and subsistence agriculture. The number one source of income is tourism — constituting some 35 percent of the entire economy — whilst the second largest source is mining. Papua New Guinea is the largest Melanesian nation in both economic and population terms. The PNG economy is largely based on its extractive industries and rich mineral deposits, which has left the country extremely vulnerable to downturns in global commodity markets. Melanesian states struggle in general with attracting private investment and creating investor confidence. Aid dependency, resource dependency, and natural disasters remain huge challenges for the region. (Sally Andrews, 2016).

China and Melanesian Nations

China has always had a presence in the Pacific. Ethnic Chinese have resided in the region for centuries, running some of the region’s oldest trading houses. Since 2006, however, China’s trade, aid, diplomatic and commercial activity has increased dramatically. Between 2006 and 2017, China provided close to US$1.5 billion in foreign aid to the Pacific Islands region through a mixture of grants and loans. China was the third largest donor to the Pacific, contributing 8% of all foreign aid to the region between 2011 and 2017 (Johnathan Pryke, 2020).

In recent decades, countries in Melanesia “have experienced more serious internal problems of insecurity and instability than their smaller Micronesian and Polynesian counterparts.” Lack of capacity, discipline and morale in law enforcement are in themselves threats to security in Melanesian states because of the complicity of law enforcement in crisis situations. The Solomon Islands - China security agreement allows for the capacity and resource needs of Solomon Islands domestic law enforcement to be provided. Since China is the Solomon Islands’ largest trading partner, riots and anti-Chinese issues need to be tackled so as not to affect their trade and diplomatic relations. This security arrangement is not abnormal as Australia had undertaken a similar arrangement with the Solomon Islands through the Regional Assistance Mission to the Solomon Islands. There is a common police culture in the Pacific. With these shared aspects of policing, the Pacific region, and especially countries in Melanesia, can focus their efforts on law enforcement co-operation. One can understand why the Solomon Islands justified its security co-operation with China, given its dissatisfaction with the Australian RAMSI arrangement and now seeking to diversify its security interests. (Patrick Kaiku, 2022). The RAMSI arrangement allowed Australian personnel and their surrogates to have a parallel economic market system. In Honiara, for example, this meant that there were shopping centres where consumers purchased items and services using Australian currency. RAMSI had no provisions for basic infrastructure development. It was purely a security arrangement that mainly employed Australian citizens.

For Fiji, the last two years 2020 – 2021 had been extremely challenging for the Fijian economy. Fiji’s ability to rapidly fully vaccinate over 90 percent of its adult population had enabled the Government to gradually ease COVID-19 restrictions and ultimately reopen borders for international travel from 01 December 2021.

A new report by the World Bank notes that Fiji was the strongest performing Pacific economy in 2022, buoyed by a rebounding tourism sector, GDP growth increased to an estimated 15.1 percent in 2022. Fiji is forecast to continue a stable growth trajectory and see inflation fall as low as 2 per cent through 2023, yet output is expected to remain below 2019 levels until 2024.” (Sanjeshni Kumar 2023)

Import and export trade between China and Fiji in 2020 was US$346 million, an increase of 63.8 per cent. China imported US$23.62m worth of goods from Fiji. Despite the significant impact of COVID-19 on global trade, bilateral economic and trade cooperation between Fiji and China remained stable.

Papua New Guinea’s economy was projected to grow by four percent in 2022, driven largely by growth in the extractives sector. PNG’s economy returned to positive growth of one percent in 2021 after contracting by 3.5 percent in 2020. In 2022, the extractive sector was projected to be the main driver of GDP growth – an estimated four percent – driven by the planned reopening of the Porgera gold mine. The overall medium-term growth in PNG is likely to be impacted by higher global uncertainty. PNG is expected to face considerable challenges from the COVID-19 pandemic, despite PNG’s economic output not being as severely impacted as in many other East Asian and Pacific economies. PNG’s extremely low level of vaccination – one of the lowest rates in the world – means COVID-19 outbreaks put significant strain on an already-stretched public health system and pose both a risk of higher loss of life and a negative impact on domestic economic activity. While local agricultural production continued unabated through the pandemic, PNG’s overall GDP growth has lagged behind global and regional averages, with performance further constrained by falling gold and liquefied natural gas (LNG) production. A sound fiscal consolidation strategy – one focused on mobilizing domestic revenue to decrease the medium-term fiscal deficit – is important for PNG to navigate while also prioritizing improvements to the delivery of public services. (World Bank, 2022).

The bulk of Vanuatu's population lives in rural areas where subsistence farming, fishing and production of cash crops such as kava, coconut and cocoa are the main sources of livelihood. Exports are dominated by agricultural products, particularly kava, coconut products, beef and cocoa. Vanuatu's economic growth has been driven largely by tourism and construction. Before 2020, tourism and tourism-related services sectors (wholesale and retail trade, hotels and restaurants, and transport and communication) accounted for approximately 40 per cent of GDP and one third of people in formal employment. Vanuatu is the largest source of Australia’s labour mobility scheme workers (7,000 in 2021-2022). (DFAT, 2023)

Vanuatu’s economic freedom score is 62.1, making its economy the 70th freest in the 2023 Index. Improvements in the investment and business climate are needed to generate more broadly based economic expansion. The unwillingness to undertake institutional reforms continues to slow the development of a dynamic private sector. Vanuatu has taken steps to integrate its economy more thoroughly into the global marketplace. Vanuatu’s property rights score; its judicial effectiveness score; and its government integrity score are all above the world average. The individual and corporate tax rates are 0 percent. The tax burden equals 14.2 percent of GDP. Starting a business remains time-consuming, but there is no minimum capital requirement. Labour codes are rigid and outmoded, and the formal labour market is not fully developed. Monetary stability has been relatively well maintained despite inflationary pressures. The trade-weighted average tariff rate is 12.7 percent, and non-tariff barriers distort trade flows. Inadequate infrastructure and heavy state involvement deter long-term investment. Access to financing remains poor with formal banking services available only to a limited number of rural adults. (Heritage.org, 2023).

The Solomon Islands’ economic freedom score is 56.9, making its economy the 106th freest in the 2023 Index. Economic dynamism and development remain stifled by serious deficiencies that include poor governance and an inefficient public sector. Underdeveloped legal and physical infrastructure discourages the emergence of a vibrant private sector. With few new enterprises to generate jobs, most employment remains in the agricultural sector. The business environment has been marginally improved by the implementation of a simplified registration process. Uneven enforcement of existing laws continues to undermine the regulatory process. The labour market is underdeveloped, and informal labour activity remains substantial. Monetary stability is weak. (Heritage.org, 2023)

Melanesia New Voices: Investing in the Next Generation

An insightful conference called “Melanesia New Voices: Investing in the Next Generation”, brought together 25 emerging leaders – five each from Fiji, New Caledonia, Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands and Vanuatu – to discuss common challenges, their hopes for the future of their region and opportunities for cooperation. Young Melanesian leaders believed that infrastructure development to enable people to take advantage of innovative technology needed to rank highly on the priorities of Melanesian nations.  Melanesian nations have narrow economic bases.  Solomon Islands, for example, relies on logging for 60 per cent of its income, which is not sustainable.  Revenue from the few other commodities that are traded is not sufficient to replace revenue from logging.  Innovation is needed to widen the economic base. High transport costs, high utility costs and poor connectivity are the main challenges to doing business.  These barriers do not allow a manufacturing sector to develop fully or to effectively compete regionally.  The region needs to look at different business models, niche products, and developing “cottage industries”.  The aquaculture sector has potential as it offers opportunities for villages to generate income and complements their traditional ways of life. Some young leaders noted the difficulties of accessing credit from commercial banks in Melanesia. Commercial banks would not take equity risks on debt and with an 80 per cent failure rate for small businesses, did not issue loans to start-up businesses.  Although the record of development banks in the region was mixed, they offer good options to support business development.  Governments, however, should be finding more ways to provide equity for small business development. (Lowyinstitute.org, 2023).

 


 3 - Economic Development of the Polynesian Group of Countries

Polynesia is a region with over one thousand islands scattered over the central and southern Pacific Ocean. Polynesia refers to islands within a triangle with its corners at the Hawaiian Islands, New Zealand, and Easter Island. Polynesia includes Tonga, Tuvalu and Samoa, and two self-governing entities namely Cook Islands and Niue There are five territories administered by other nations that have Polynesian links. They are New Caledonia, French Polynesia, Wallis & Futuna and Tokelau.

Most Polynesian nations acquire their income from foreign aid and remittances. A few have income that is sourced from tourism. Some have innovative ways of attaining national income; Tuvalu gets royalties from its '.tv' internet top-level domain name. The Cook Islands' make money from postage stamp sales. French Polynesia exports cultured pearls. New Caledonia has rich deposits of nickel, chromite, and iron ore. (NewWorldEncyclopedia, 2023).

Polynesian economic development is intertwined with climate change issues that deeply affects them. Leaders from American Samoa, Samoa, Tokelau, Tonga, Tuvalu and Wallis and Futuna had met to discuss the impacts of climate change in Polynesia. They produced a declaration addressing the impacts of climate change, carbon emission reductions, climate change displacement and security, climate change finance, the marine environment, and regional initiatives. On the impacts of climate change, leaders expressed deep concern on the risks to small islands, including marine ecosystem impacts, sea level rise and extreme weather events. Leaders noted that these risks threaten the survival of island communities, particularly those living on coral atolls. They stated with alarm that current global efforts to combat climate change are insufficient to secure the 1.5 degree Celsius limit. They look forward to the completion of the Paris Agreement Implementation Guidelines, noting there should be “a complete package on the implementation of all elements of the Paris Agreement” and should including financial aspects of ‘Loss and Damage’. (“Loss and damage” is a general term used in UN climate negotiations to refer to the consequences of climate change that go beyond what people can adapt to, or when options exist but a community doesn’t have the resources to access or utilize them. Developed countries agreed at the COP27 UN climate summit in 2022 to create a fund for addressing losses and damages to vulnerable nations. (Preety Bhandari, et-al, 2022)

On climate change finance, Polynesian leaders noted with concern the costs of climate change-related severe weather events that cause devastation and loss of lives in the region and welcome the Task Force of the Pacific Island Climate Change Insurance Facility (PICCIF) and encourage it to accelerate its work. They further encourage eligible Polynesian nations to develop Green Climate Fund (GCF) Country Programmes while also respecting the principle of leaving no one behind. (Sdg.iisd 2018).

Due to Tuvalu’s geographic isolation, growth accelerated to 1.5% in 2021 as the country remained free from COVID-19. Capital expenditures almost doubled, offsetting low consumption—that led tax revenues to decline by a fifth. Business travel and remittances are projected to return to pre-pandemic levels as international borders gradually open. GDP is forecast to grow by 3.0% in 2023. The fiscal surplus narrowed from the equivalent of 8.7% of GDP in 2020 to 5.4% in 2021. As expenditures dropped by 13% and revenues fell, the government noted a fiscal deficit equal to 9.7% of GDP in 2022. The 27.6% growth in expenditures outweigh the projected 10.6% rise in revenues. (ARIC, 2022)

It is noted that China is one of Tonga’s development partners and they have signed twenty economic and technical agreements over the last 24 years. In 2022 China provided heavy machinery, worth TOP $26 million and customs inspection equipment, of TOP $30 million (Cao Xiaolin, 2022)

French Polynesia has very strong relations with China. In November 2019, Edouard Fritch, the President said that  French Polynesia was part of China’s Belt and Road Initiative: “It is therefore by the common interest shown by Chinese private investors that China has chosen to place French Polynesia on the Silk Road.” French Polynesia, like other island states or territories, seeks to develop its own balance of power. It has a strategic maritime space of 118 islands between Asia and America, covering an EEZ of nearly 4.5 million square kilometres. Its southern position also makes the territory suitable for all types of space observation and modern forms of connectivity (aerial, extra-atmospheric, navigation, telecommunications). The Polynesian government sees in China a conduit for economic growth that no other player can offer it. (Paco Milhiet, June 23, 2022)

Samoa’s economic performance in the year up to June 2022 amounted to SAT$1.85 billion (real GDP), which was 6 percent lower than the twelve months to June 2021. This marks three consecutive years of negative growth. The recession in the Samoan economy started with the Measles Outbreak in December 2019 which was followed by the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020 right up to June 2022. The international border lockdown resulted in a substantial economic loss of SAT$234 million. Russia’s conflict with Ukraine further drove up imported prices like fuel and gas culminating in Samoa’s inflation rate of 11.3 percent at the end of October 2022.

The huge drop in tourism earnings was outweighed by the pickup in remittances as well as a substantive increase in seasonal workers’ income. Samoa also received large inflows of aid grant funds for its COVID-19 Response and general budget support funds from Australia, New Zealand, the People's Republic of China and Japan.

The Samoan economy has been in a prolonged recession for 30 months and it is important to support the recovery of local businesses and employment opportunities, especially for those who have struggled during the pandemic. From the experiences of other small Pacific island nations, targeted fiscal assistance to the most vulnerable can provide some relief from the high cost of living while an expansionary monetary policy stance can ensure funds are available for the private sector and Government, supporting the Samoan economy recovery path from the COVID pandemic. (CBS,2022)

The economic recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic in tourism-dependent Polynesian nations will be slow, with continued support needed to allow the private sector to drive future economic growth. The economies of the Cook Islands, Niue, Samoa, and Tonga declined in 2021 with economic contraction and fiscal deficits deepening. In the Cook Islands, the economy contracted by 5.9% in 2020, on account of reduced income from tourism—which accounted for 61% of GDP in 2019—falling to zero since April 2021. In Tonga, the twin shocks of Tropical Cyclone Harold and COVID-19 restrictions saw the economy weaken by 0.5 percent (ADB, 2022).

 


 4: Economic Developments in the Micronesian Group

Heritage.org reports that poor governance and a lack of commitment to structural reform continue to discourage economic development in Micronesia. Long-standing problems include poor management of public finance and underdeveloped regulatory frameworks. The weak rule of law and poor enforcement of property rights have driven many people into the informal sector.

The Micronesia Group comprise of nations in the western Pacific Ocean. Micronesia has more than 600 islands and islets in the Caroline Islands archipelago and is divided along cultural and language lines into the states of Yap, Chuuk, Pohnpei, and Kosrae. The capital is Palikir, on the island of Pohnpei. To the west of the Federated States of Micronesia lies the Republic of Palau, also in the Caroline archipelago, and to the east is the Republic of the Marshall Islands. These two nations, together with the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands and the Federated States of Micronesia, were administered by the United States as the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands from 1947 to 1986.

Due to their smallness and isolation, Micronesia experiences huge obstacles to growth due to its geographic isolation, small population, capacity constraints, and susceptibility to natural hazards.

Micronesia’s economy is dependent on fisheries and development aid, including funds it receives under its Compact of Free Association with the United States. These funds have been decreasing since 2004. The Micronesian economy was greatly affected by border closures connected to the COVID-19 pandemic.

The World Bank supported Kiribati and Marshall Islands, for example, to improve sustainable ocean-based livelihoods. Training was provided to build the capacity of observers and debriefers for sustainable oceanic resources management and 21 coastal communities received support to establish community fisheries management plans. Long-term tensions like climate change, population growth, shocks caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, cyclones, and other disasters are impacting lives across Micronesia. These stresses drive the need for action to preserve and protect ocean resources, fisheries, coastal and marine habitats, and the people whose livelihoods depend on them.  The Western and Central Pacific Ocean is the most important region globally for tuna fisheries, accounting for around 60 percent of the global catch. Across countries in this area, economic benefit from oceanic tuna license fees amounted to US$492.5 million per year, representing more than 30 percent of government revenue. Coastal fisheries are an important source of income, nutrition and food for fifty percent of households in Micronesia. Coastal fisheries are critical to the cultural and fiscal value at the national level, contributing an estimated 49 percent of the overall fisheries input to GDP, highlighting the significance of these fisheries to the Micronesian way of life. Better management of oceanic and coastal fisheries is important for generating export earnings and public revenues from fishing license fees. Greater income improves livelihoods and food security, and leads to improved diets. The World Bank expects Micronesia and the Pacific to sustainably exploit the available economic opportunities through expanding markets for oceanic and coastal fisheries and trialing of new technologies such as electronic monitoring and reporting systems (World Bank, 2022).

The Asian Development Bank (ADB) has provided 66 public sector loans, grants, and technical aid amounting to $187.8 million to the FSM. Cumulative loan and grant support to the FSM totalled $98.4 million. Financing was from regular and concessional ordinary capital resources, ADB’s current state portfolio in the FSM includes 2 loans and 9 grants worth $75.3 million. In Micronesia, the ADB focuses on building resilience against economic shocks, delivering sustainable services, and promoting inclusive and sustainable growth. It introduced greater flexibility in procurement and contracting; and more emphasis on gender equality. In 2021, ADB committed a $5 million grant to help prepare a sustainable road investment project suitable for financing in 2023 or 2024. ADB also committed additional financing of $4 million grant for a renewable energy project, which will finance supplemental management and operations assistance to Pohnpei Utilities Corporation. ADB has provided $21.5 million in grant assistance for the FSM’s COVID-19 response and $6 million for disaster contingent financing for early recovery and reconstruction following natural hazards or health emergencies. A $14 million health and livelihood program helped mitigate COVID-19 impacts on health, tourism, and social protection. (Asian Development Bank 12/3/2023)

Digital Economy

In small and isolated Pacific regions like Micronesia, digital technologies and e-commerce can improve livelihoods by increasing trade across sectors and industries. Individuals and groups running small businesses can access new markets, reduce transaction costs, encourage financial inclusion and increase exports. Small markets and population sizes also make Micronesia less attractive for international investment. The cultural and language diversity also poses a problem to developing local online content. The Pacific Digital Economy Programme, jointly administered by UNCDF, UNCTAD and UNDP supports the development of inclusive digital economies in the Micronesian nations of the Federated States of Micronesia, Kiribati and the Republic of the Marshall Island (UNCTAD, 2023).

China Trade with Micronesia

In December 2022, China exported $1.84M and imported $4.08k from Micronesia, resulting in a positive trade balance of $1.83M. Between December 2021 and December 2022 the exports of China have increased by $737k (66.9%) from $1.1M to $1.84M, while imports decreased by $-191k (-97.9%) from $195k to $4.08k.

In December 2022, the top exports of China to Micronesia were Prefabricated Buildings ($312k), Toilet Paper ($220k), Plastic Housewares ($110k), Sanitary towels (pads) ($105k), and Coated Flat-Rolled Iron ($94.1k). In December 2022 the top imports of China from Micronesia were Non-fillet Frozen Fish ($71.2k), Commodities not elsewhere specified ($257), and Low-voltage Protection Equipment ($92).OEC,2023.

Chinese Ambassador to Micronesia Huang Zheng (Huang) noted that China and Micronesia signed the Memorandum of Understanding on jointly building the "Belt and Road" in 2018, and now China has become an important trading partner with the country. It is the fourth-largest destination for exports and source of imports for Micronesia. In 2021, overall bilateral trade volume increased by 24.2 percent year-on-year. China has long insisted on providing economic and technical assistance without any political conditions, and has implemented many key assistance projects, including roads, bridges, schools, government buildings, sports venues and agricultural demonstration parks, while providing material assistance in the form of aircraft, ships, vehicles, cultural and sports equipment. China has also provided training for hundreds of Micronesian people in various fields. Since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, China has provided several batches of epidemic prevention materials and cash assistance to Micronesia, and assisted with the construction of 30 sets of quarantine booths. (Yin Yeping 2022)

5 - Summary

The Pacific region comprises of hundreds of islands spread out over an area equivalent to 15% of the earth’s surface. There is great diversity; Fiji for example is the largest country (excluding PNG) with a population of over 980,000, to Tuvalu and Nauru, with populations of about 11,000 each. Kiribati is one of the most remote and geographically dispersed countries in the world, consisting of 33 coral atolls spread over 3.5 million square kilometres of ocean. Pacific Island nations have large natural resources. They have unique linguistic and cultural diversity. They are working to develop digital connectivity and trade in goods and services with external markets.

 It should be noted that Pacific countries are physically far away from the rest of the big markets, have small populations living across many islands, face many of the worst impacts of climate change, and are some of the world’s most vulnerable nations to natural disasters. The 2022 eruption of Tonga’s undersea volcano and the ensuing tsunami, for example, caused over US$90 million in damages and impacted 85 percent of the country’s population (The World Bank, 2022).

Pacific Island nations are important economic and trade partners of China. Belt and Road cooperation MOUs have been signed with all ten nations that have diplomatic relations with China. Progress has been achieved in areas such as policy development, infrastructure, trade, financial and people-to-people connectivity. Two-way trade between China and Pacific nations has continued to expand. From 1992 to 2021, total trade volume between China and Pacific nations grew from US153 million to USD5.3 billion showing an average annual increase of 13% and expanding by over 30 times in 30 years. By the end of 2021, China’s direct investment in Pacific nations having diplomatic relations with China had reached USD 2.72 billion. (FMPRC, 2022)

Small is awesome!

Small states in the Pacific and elsewhere are an important component of the global community. About two-thirds of United Nations members are small nations. They have certain characteristics due to their smallness. The range of issues they face is more limited but are no less urgent or intense than that of larger states.

Small states in the Pacific are already organised into groups based on cultural, geographic, political, socio-economic or a combination of these elements. Small states recognise the valuable role that multilateral diplomacy plays in enhancing their engagement and amplifying their voices, thus levelling the playing field. However, they face challenges as the resources needed for gathering support for their positions may be weaker. Smaller nations can develop strong voting blocs to advocate their issues or global concerns, for example on climate change. This can result in innovative solutions being found. (Diplo, 2023).

This paper asserts that encouraging small nations to leverage their smallness to benefit from Economies of scale will enhance their economic growth. This means that a number of Pacific nations can come together to form an economic union.

The economic union proposal becomes necessary when contextualised in the status that small states are exposed to a high degree of economic openness often with a dependence on strategic imports (particularly food, energy, and industrial supplies). The context is also seen in a dependence on a narrow range of exports or services; and susceptibility to external economic shocks. Consequently, vulnerability is often seen to be a key element in defining them. In determining a small state’s economic vulnerabilities, key elements include economic openness and the link between smallness and remoteness, and connections between smallness and low levels of development. In economic diplomacy, the resilience that small states have to economic vulnerability and the way these vulnerabilities affect their bilateral and multilateral economic diplomacy is important to consider. (Diplo, 2023)

In the economic union model, regional arrangements provide small states with the opportunity to insert their economies into larger economic frameworks. Regional economic integration provides a common platform through which members can better promote their collective interests with the rest of the international community and in multilateral arrangements, often advocating for recognition of their specific challenges. (Diplo, 2023).

Building synergies in the Pacific to enhance economic growth

It is noted that in the 50 year history of Pacific regionalism there have been underlying tensions between Polynesians, Melanesians and Micronesians. Within the Micronesian region, there have been tensions between Northern and Southern nations. In Melanesia, there is a perception that Fijians are not genuine Melanesians and Polynesians are sometimes offended that Fijians are categorised as Polynesians.

Behind the friendly smiles and the calm demeanour, there is often an undercurrent of hostility and resentment. One huge task for technocrats organising regional leaders meetings is to maintain harmony. Meetings are very friendly affairs with decisions arrived after consensus. Leaders’ disagreements are handled before formal meetings are held.

For economic development to move to the next level, there is a need for a culture of transparency and accountability to permeate the Pacific Leaders Forum. The old ways of making decisions where juicy regional positions are given out according to a roster based on regional groupings should give way to merit based selections. Baron Waqa the incoming Secretary General of the Pacific Forum acquired the position after Micronesian nations threatened to break away from the Pacific Forum. He is remembered for his authoritarian leadership style and suppression of democratic rights during his tenure as President of Nauru. Under Waqa, Nauru had recognised  the Russian Republics. There had also been huge allegations of corruption earning him the name President Corruption. Waqa who is a supporter of Taiwan had placed 50 Taiwan ‘banners’ in the Conference Centre of a Pacific Forum Meeting and had been offended when the Chinese delegation had intervened to remind Pacific leaders of the One China Policy. 

Greg Fry writes that it is important to recall that in the 50-year history of attempts to build a Pacific political community among the diverse island societies across Oceania there have been numerous splits and divisions – between leaders, between sub-regions, between large and small states, and between resource-rich and resource-poor states. Many of these divisions were hard-felt and hard-fought, and many of them could have spelt the end of the regional project. It is still useful to remember why, and how, past Pacific diplomacy was so effective in creating and maintaining a feeling of inclusion for each sub-region. The division between sub-regions, and the attendant issues of respect, balance and inclusion, began with the emergence of Melanesian sub-regional identity in the late 1970s. Greg Fry noted that when he interviewed Melanesian leaders about their views on Pacific regionalism in 1975, they said that they felt that the Polynesian leaders looked down on them, making them feel like second-class citizens in the Pacific regional community. Fiji identified itself as, and was seen as, Polynesian in the 1970s. After the 1987 coup, it reinvented itself as a Melanesian nation (Greg Fry, 2021).

The Micronesians did not emerge as a sub-region within Pacific regionalism until the 1990s following the decolonisation and admission to Forum membership of the three associated states: Federated States of Micronesia, Marshall Islands, and Palau. Before this, Nauru, as founding member of the Forum, and Kiribati as a member since 1979, had not self-identified as part of a Micronesian sub-grouping. (Greg Fry, 2021)

Australia and New Zealand who are members of the Pacific islands usually support Melanesia and Polynesia. Micronesian nations usually ask why, if the French entities could join the PIF, United States ones such as Guam, American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of Northern Marianas could not do the same. The assumption was that Australia and New Zealand did not want them in the PIF as it would dilute the votes of their “zones of influence.” One of the reasons the PACER Plus Trade Deal has had pushbacks from larger Pacific nations is because it is overtly designed to “preserve New Zealand’s and Australia’s position against major competitors from outside of the region. Micronesia, with its strong ties to the United States (and Japan) is seen as inconvenient in the order of things. (Cleo Paskal, 10/2/2021).

Need for regional anti-corruption strategies that actually work!

For economic development to be accelerated, Pacific nations will need to tackle corruption issues. The Global Corruption Barometer Survey 2021 noted that young democracies with rich natural endowments, frequent natural disasters and relatively small populations characterise many Pacific Island nations, making them vulnerable to corruption risks. Yet data about levels and patterns of corruption in the region had remained frustratingly scarce. The GCB Pacific Survey 2021 recorded for the first time the perceptions and experiences of corruption among ordinary citizens from ten Pacific countries and territories. The results reveal high levels of bribery, sextortion and vote-buying. A majority of respondents feel corruption is a big problem in both the business sector and government, particularly among parliamentarians and officials in heads of governments’ offices. It also appears that authorities are failing to properly control resource extraction companies.

A third of interviewees across the Pacific think that most or all members of parliament and staff in heads of government’s offices are involved in corruption. Less than a fifth of respondents (18 per cent) believe that corrupt officials frequently face appropriate consequences for their actions. Only 14 per cent feel their government regularly considers them when making decisions. One of the most significant results was how often ordinary people in the Pacific directly encounter corruption in their daily lives. Thirty-two per cent of interviewees recently paid a bribe to receive public services – a higher rate than any other region surveyed by Transparency International.  Bribery appears to be a problem across a range of government services, from applying for official government documents to dealing with the police. Only 13 per cent of those who paid a bribe for a public service reported it. This rises to around 30 per cent in Fiji and Kiribati. Even more worrying is that 38 per cent of respondents say they or someone they know have personally experienced “sextortion”, where a official requests sexual acts in exchange for an essential government service.

A majority of people interviewed feel that corruption is a big problem in business, too. A corruption hotspot appears to be government contracts, which over two thirds of respondents believe businesses secure through bribes and connections. Almost half of the people surveyed think there is little control over companies who extract natural resources, which is of particular concern given that this is one of the largest industries in the region. The good news is that over 70 per cent of respondents say that ordinary people can help to fight corruption.  Most Pacific Islanders support their government’s anti-corruption measures and believe that ordinary people can help stop corruption. Pacific leaders across the ten countries have indicated that they are willing to tackle this problem, through public commitments and national reform efforts. By listening to the voices of Pacific Islanders themselves about their corruption concerns, governments can make meaningful reforms and ultimately create a fairer and more sustainable region. (Transparency International, 2021)

Pacific Regionalism and Trade

It is very important that the 18 nations and territories that make up the Pacific re-examine their notions of what Pacific regionalism means for them. In recent times, the Pacific Islands Forum has degenerated into an arena where different countries band together based on their regional affiliations and haggle for everything from senior positions (with very lucrative salaries) and resources. The haggling, backroom deals, intrigue, and threats to leave the Forum has resulted in decisions being made that is not based on merit or transparency but on expediency to ensure that everyone is kept happy. The main job of technocrats who run the leaders’ meetings is to make sure that leaders are kept happy, even if it means generous supplies of drinks during cocktails.

Pacific regionalism should be based on honest discussions even if loud voices are raised in disagreement. Leaders should be allowed to talk freely rather than suppressing their real sentiments for self-serving remarks aimed at keeping everyone happy. Should there really be a need for divisions based on Micronesia, Polynesia and Melanesia given that this is a hangover from colonial times? Are these labels really necessary when we engage the world and need unified voices in our regional stance especially in climate change, ocean conservation, sustainable development, and the necessity to ensure Pacific maritime zones and rights are not affected by rising sea levels?

In 2019, Dame Meg Taylor, then Secretary General of PIF, urged Pacific Island nations to think “as a collective rather than only considering bilateral gains”. Nevertheless, driven by their own national interests, individual Pacific Island countries have taken varied positions. FSM called for a détente and cooperation between external powers. Palau and the Marshall Islands supported the United States while countries like Fiji and the Solomon Island  try to balance their foreign relations. (Denghua Zhang & Walter Diamana, 17/12/2021)

Many Pacific leaders see themselves as leaders first of their own nations (and often of their political constituencies). This clouds their perceptions of regionalism as they are more concerned about how much of the regional cake they can take to satisfy national constituencies. This means that the bulk of regional leaders’ discussions is useless drivel that does not genuinely promote Pacific regionalism. They need to transcend this street mentality and look at the bigger picture of supporting regional initiatives even if this might mean less of the regional cake going into their own nations. Pacific leaders usually come up with noble sounding regional statements but as soon as they reach their countries, their priorities are on political survival and the regional rhetoric gets thrown into the dustheap! Pacific leaders must be visionary in their demeanour rather than being demagogies and street thugs too preoccupied with trying to survive in the political minefields.

Abc.net (30/5/2022). Pacific nations walk away from trade and security deal with China as Australia aims to 'build stronger family'. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-05-30/pacific-nations-shelve-region-wide-china-deal/101109614

ADB. (2022) Polynesia Facing Slow Economic Recovery from COVID https://www.adb.org/news/polynesia-facing-slow-economic-recovery-covid-adb

Andre Loo (2023) Economies of Scale - Definition, Effects, Types, and Sources

https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/economics/economies-of-scale

 Asian Development Bank (accessed 12/3/2023) Micronesia. https://www.adb.org/countries/micronesia/economy

Cao Xiaolin (21/11/2022) Chinese modernization and China-Tonga friendly relations and cooperation. https://matangitonga.to/2022/11/21/chinese-modernization-and-china-tonga-friendly-relations-and-cooperation

CBS (2022) state of samoa’s economy and outlook for fy2022 / 2023. https://www.cbs.gov.ws/whats-new/state-of-samoas-economy-and-outlook-for-fy20222023/#:~:text=Given%20the%20latest%20available%20information,drop%20to%20around%20%2D3.0%20percent

Cleo Paskal (10/2/2021) How the Pacific Islands Forum Fell Apart. https://thediplomat.com/2021/02/how-the-pacific-islands-forum-fell-apart/

Denghua Zhang & Walter Diamana (17/12/2021) Is there a future for Pacific regionalism? Entering uncharted waters. https://www.policyforum.net/is-there-a-future-for-pacific-regionalism/

DFAT (accessed 2023) Australia’s engagement in Vanuatu. https://www.dfat.gov.au/geo/vanuatu/engagement-in-vanuatu#:~:text=Economic

Diplo (accessed 17/3/2023) Diplomacy of small states. https://www.diplomacy.edu/topics/diplomacy-of-small-states/

Felix Chaudhary (24/2/2021) 63.8pc increase in bilateral trade between Fiji, China. https://www.fijitimes.com.fj/63-8pc-increase-in-bilateral-trade-between-fiji-china/

FMPRC. (25/4/2022) Fact Sheet: Cooperation Between China and Pacific Island Countries. https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/wjdt_665385/2649_665393/202205/t20220524_10691917.html

Francis Hezel & Sophie Foster (accessed on 12/3/2023) MIcroneesi. https://www.britannica.com/place/Micronesia-republic-Pacific-Ocean

Greg Fry (23/2/2021) The Pacific Islands Forum split: possibilities for Pacific diplomacy. https://devpolicy.org/the-pacific-islands-forum-split-possibilities-for-pacific-diplomacy-20210223/

Heritage.org. (accessed on 12/3/2023) Micronesia. https://www.heritage.org/index/country/micronesia

Heritage.org. (2023).Vanuatu. https://www.heritage.org/index/country/vanuatu

Heritage.org. (2023) Solomon islands. https://www.heritage.org/index/country/solomonislands

Indeed.com (accessed 13/3/2023) Economies of scale https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/career-development/economies-of-scale

Jean-Paul Rodrigue (accessed 13/3/2023) https://transportgeography.org/contents/chapter7/globalization-international-trade/economic-integration-levels/

Jihye Lee (27/10/2022) Asia-Pacific will lead global economic growth in 2023, S&P says. https://www.cnbc.com/2022/10/27/asia-pacific-will-lead-global-economic-growth-in-2023-sp-says.html

Jonathan Pryke (23/6/2020) The Risks of China’s Ambitions in the South Pacific. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/publications/risks-china-s-ambitions-south-pacific

Lowyinstitute.org. (Accessed 18/3/2023)Melanesia New Voices: Investing in the Next Generation. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/publications/melanesia-new-voices-investing-next-generation

Marc Saxer (21/07/2022). A war far away in Europe? The impact of the Ukraine war on Asia is far greater than you think. https://asia.fes.de/news/ukraine-impact-on-asia-and-global-order

MSG (accessed 16/3/2023) MSG Trade. https://msgsec.info/msg-trade/

Muhammad Eid Balbaa, Mansur Eshov, and Nilufar Ismailova. 2022. The Impacts of Russian Ukrainian War on the Global Economy. https://doi.org/10.1145/3584202.358422

newworldencyclopedia. (accessed 15/3/2023) Polynesia. https://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Polynesia

OEC (accessed 13/3/2023). China and Micronesia. https://oec.world/en/profile/bilateral-country/chn/partner/fsm

Oecd.org. (26/1/2021) COVID-19 pandemic: Towards a blue recovery in small island developing states. https://www.oecd.org/coronavirus/policy-responses/covid-19-pandemic-towards-a-blue-recovery-in-small-island-developing-states-241271b7/

Oecd.org (accessed 16/3/2023). Small Islands Developing States. https://www.oecd.org/dac/financing-sustainable-development/development-finance-topics/small-island-developing-states.htm

Open Textbook Pilot Project (accessed 13/3/2023) Economies of scale and international trade. California State University. https://socialsci.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Economics/Book%3A_International_Trade_-_Theory_and_Policy/06%3A_Economies_of_Scale_and_International_Trade

Paco Milhiet (June 23, 2022) French Polynesia Has Its Own China Dream. https://thediplomat.com/2022/06/french-polynesia-has-its-own-china-dream/

Patrick Kaiku (23/5/2022) PNG and the Solomon Islands-China security agreement. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/png-solomon-islands-china-security-agreement

PINA (2022) Pacific Island nations eye more opportunities: Pacific …

https://pina.com.fj/2022/11/23/pacific-island

Pita Ligaiula. (15/3/2023). Melanesian Spearhead Group marks 35 years of existence https://pina.com.fj/2023/03/15/melanesian-spearhead-group-marks-35-years-of-existence/

Preety Bhandari, Nate Warszawski, Deirdre Cogan & Rhys Gerholdt (14/12/2022)

What Is "Loss and Damage" from Climate Change? 8 Key Questions, Answered

December 14, 2022. https://www.wri.org/insights/loss-damage-climate-change

Ralph Jennings (2023) China, South Pacific trade talks being explored, and the islands want to gauge China’s ‘appetite’. https://www.msn.com/en-xl/news/other/china-south-pacific-trade-talks-being-explored-and-the-islands-want-to-gauge-china-s-appetite/ar-AA18GacL

Sally Andrews (8/6/2016) Staying Afloat: The Future of the Melanesian Economies:“Aid dependency, resource dependency, and natural disasters remain huge challenges for the region.” https://thediplomat.com/2016/06/staying-afloat-the-future-of-the-melanesian-economies/

Sdg.iisd (5/6/2018) Polynesian Leaders Issue Declaration on Climate Change and Oceans. https://sdg.iisd.org/news/polynesian-leaders-issue-declaration-on-climate-change-and-oceans/

Sanjeshni Kumar (1/3/2023) Fiji strongest performing – World Bank economic update.https://pina.com.fj/2023/03/01/fiji-strongest-performing-world-bank-economic-update/

Sanjeshni Kumar (23/11/2022) Pacific Island nations eye more opportunities: Pacific Trade Invest China. https://pina.com.fj/2022/11/23/pacific-island-nations-eye-more-opportunities-pacific-trade-invest-china/

Shraddha Sureka (accessed 17/3/2023) Economic Union. https://www.wallstreetmojo.com/economic-union/

Transparency International (2021) Global Corruption Barometer Pacific Survey 2021. https://www.transparency.org/en/news/gcb-pacific-2021-survey-people-voices-corruption-bribery?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=share-button

Tuvalu Overview. https://aric.adb.org/tuvalu/overview

UNCTAD (16/2/2023). How digital economy can improve livelihoods in the Pacific. https://unctad.org/news/how-digital-economy-can-improve-livelihoods-pacific

World Atlas (accessed 16/3/2023) https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/which-countries-and-territories-make-up-melanesia.html

World Bank (2022) Supporting a Path to More Ocean-Based Livelihoods through More Sustainable Management of Pacific Islands Fisheries. https://www.worldbank.org/en/results/2022/08/10/supporting-a-path-to-more-ocean-based-livelihoods-through-more-sustainable-management-of-pacific-islands-fisheries

World Bank (9/2022) Pacific islands Overview. https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/pacificislands/overview#3

World Bank (27/2/2023) Pacific Economic Update. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2023/02/27/pacific-economic-update

World Bank (1/3/2023) The Pacific Economic Update, February 2023. https://reliefweb.int/report/fiji/pacific-economic-update-february-2023

World Bank (4/3/2022) Papua New Guinea Economic Update: PNG Economy Navigating a Fragile Recovery. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2022/03/04/papua-new-guinea-economic-update-png-economy-navigating-a-fragile-recovery

Yin Yeping (3.6/2022) China's cooperation with Micronesia yields tangible results, generally welcomed: ambassador. https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202206/1267214.shtml


Monday, January 30, 2023

Annual corruption report reveals fourth year of stagnation in the Pacific

Joseph Veramu and Mariam Mathew

The 2022 Corruption Perceptions Index[1] (CPI) released by Transparency International (TI) showed that the Asia Pacific region stagnated with an average score of 45 for the fourth year in a row.

We emphasize that the 1- or 2-point differences in country scores in this paragraph is not statistically significant and not necessarily indicative of larger trends. Fiji leads the Pacific but fell from 55 to 53 this year. Vanuatu gained 3 points from last year to register a score of 48. The Solomon Islands fell by 1 point to 42. Papua New Guinea (PNG) once again scores least but further fell by 1 point from last year to register this year’s score of 30. Across the pond New Zealand leads in Oceania and second globally with a score of 87. It fell by 1 point from last year’s score. Australia’s score is 75; a 2-point increase from last year.

Despite the opportunity presented by the numerous diplomatic summits held in the region in 2022, (including the Pacific Islands Forum in July) states continued to focus on economic development at the expense of other priorities, including anti-corruption efforts.

Mariam Mathew, Pacific Advisor at TI Secretariat said, “The Pacific has shown some encouraging signs, notably the endorsement of the Teieniwa vision in 2021 and the 2050 Strategy for the Blue Pacific Continent in 2022, but anti-corruption commitments have not yet translated into reduced corruption rates”.

Pacific country insights:

Joseph Veramu, Executive Director of CLCT Integrity Fiji said, “We applaud the new government for committing to repeal many undemocratic laws and measures taken by the previous government. We now urge them to prioritise strengthening anti-corruption efforts. This includes ensuring that the Fiji Independent Commission against Corruption (FICAC) remains operational and is able to operate independently and with adequate capacity”. As Fiji’s score in the 2022 CPI fell by 2 points since last year, we believe that all stakeholders in Government, the media, private sector and civil society should work together to curb corruption.”

Ruth Liloqula, Executive Director of Transparency Solomon Islands noted, “The 2022 CPI score of Solomon Islands shows that government’s efforts to tackle corruption in the public sector is not going anywhere; it has become stagnant. The key Government Institutions that should be leading or providing the leadership, bringing in reforms etc. in this fight, are the most corrupt.” On a positive note, Liloqula said that the determination of CSO’s, journalists, concerned citizens, and actors within the government were tenacious in the fight against corruption. “Power is in people’s hand to hold leaders to account and to nurture leaders who develop a culture of integrity and anti-corruption in government,” she added.

PNG in 2022 experienced what is being called the country’s worst elections ever[2] despite a history of electoral rife. TI PNG’s report[3] found numerous irregularities, with out-of-date election rolls, stolen ballot boxes and even bouts of violence. None of this bodes well for democratic development in PNG and may directly affect its future CPI score. 

Vanuatu however, was a bright spot this year. The people are becoming more aware of corruption as an issue, as civil society organisations form coalitions to hold government accountable. In an important win, the government committed to establishing an anti-corruption commission in late 2021. Yet the country continues to grapple with political instability, with snap elections held this year[4] after the prospect of a no-confidence vote triggered the president to call elections in August.

Clancy Moore, CEO of TI Australia noted, “Across the Pacific, corruption poses a direct threat to national and regional peace, stability and security. The Australian government’s foreign policy should prioritise promoting democracy, good governance and civil society accountability efforts.” He added “TI Australia works with our chapters in the Pacific to tackle corruption risks in the mining and infrastructure sector which are skyrocketing as governments and businesses invest in renewable energy. We can also work together to stop money laundering in the region.”

 Insights into New Zealand and Australia

Anne Tolley, Chair of TI New Zealand stated, “While New Zealand remains among the least corrupt countries in the world, the drop from first is a reminder that complacency is not an option in our battle against corruption,” “The gradual decline in our ranking among the component indexes that measure business perceptions is particularly troublesome. Maintaining low levels of corruption is essential for our trade dependent economy,” Tolley added.

Julie Haggie, CEO of TI New Zealand stated, “the good news in 2023 will be the drafting of legislation creating a register of beneficial ownership which will improve monitoring and investigation by government agencies, whilst also reducing business compliance costs. We are looking forward to hearing about progress towards a more transparent government procurement system. TI New Zealand has been actively advocating on these issues and is regularly involved in consultations.”

Clancy Moore noted “after ten years of democratic backsliding, Australia is now in 13th place behind countries including New Zealand and Denmark scoring 75 points on the 100-point scale. “Australia’s score is 10 points lower than in 2012, though a two-point increase in this year’s report – from its lowest ever score of 73 last year – shows Australia may be turning the corner off the back of the landmark National Anti-Corruption Commission. To be a leader in tackling corruption, Australia should introduce a whole of government anti-corruption strategy including comprehensive whistle blower protections, reforms to political donations, expenditure, unfair lobbying and strong laws to stop money laundering.”

Recommendations:

During the Pacific Islands Forum Leaders meeting in July 2022, Transparency International Pacific chapters[5] had urged leaders[6] to respond to key corruption findings from a public survey assessing people’s views and experiences of corruption in ten forum member countries and territories. With the 2022 CPI scores being released, it is important that these recommendations be revisited. They are listed as follows:

(a) Strengthening accountability of political leaders, requiring all high-level officials to publicly disclose their income and assets, tightly monitoring discretionary public funds, and empowering the police and courts to properly investigate and punish corruption

(b) Increasing transparency in the relationship between government and businesses, by monitoring companies’ involvement in electoral campaigns and policy making, and by ensuring that all public contracts are awarded fairly and competitively

(c)  Eradicating bribery opportunities by investing in clear and uncomplicated systems for accessing public services

(d)    Ensuring elections are fair and free of vote-buying or threats, by strengthening independent electoral commissions and anti-corruption agencies

(e)   Introducing and enforcing right to information and whistle-blower protection laws, so that citizens and journalists can hold power to account without fear of retaliation.

Anti-corruption activists in the region need to redouble their efforts and actively engage governments nationally and at regional forums to combat the growing scourge of corruption.

  [1] 2022 Corruption Perceptions Index

[2] https://www.economist.com/asia/2022/08/11/papua-new-guinea-conducts-its-worst-election-ever

[3] https://transparencypng.org.pg/tipng-domestic-election-observation-report-2022/

[4] https://www.rnz.co.nz/international/pacific-news/476496/vanuatu-election-international-observers-arrive

[5] Transparency International Pacific chapters include Transparency Vanuatu, Transparency Solomon Islands, Transparency International PNG, CLCT Integrity Fiji, Transparency International Australia and Transparency International New Zealand

[6] https://twitter.com/integrity_fiji/status/1545670098249080833

How did Fiji Perform in the Corruption Perceptions Index 2022?

The Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) 2022 results released at Tanoa Plaza Hotel on Jan 31, 2023 by CLCT Integrity Fiji showed that Fiji’s score has fallen. Fiji’s score has gone down from last year’s figure of 55 to 53 out of 100 this year. Fiji’s ranking has also fallen from 45 out of 180 nations last year to 49.This 2 points drop is not currently statistically significant or indicative of larger trends. Fiji first appeared in the CPI in 2004 and there was a lapse of 17 years before the next CPI for Fiji came out last year. We would need to see a few more years of CPI scores for Fiji before we can observe the larger trends.

While a fall of 2 points (implying an increase in corruption) is not statistically significant, it highlights the urgent need for civil society, the business sector, the media and all stakeholders to work together with Fiji’s anti-corruption agency FICAC to curb corruption.

Transparency International notes that “A country’s score is the perceived level of public sector corruption on a scale of 0-100, where 0 means highly corrupt and 100 means very clean. A country's rank is its position relative to the other countries in the index. Ranks can change merely if the number of countries included in the index changes. The rank is therefore not as important as the score in terms of indicating the level of corruption in that country.”

For a period of 17 years from 2004 to 2021, Fiji was not included in the CPI because it was not featured in at least 3 of the CPI’s 13 data sources.

Grace Konrote noted that, “Fiji’s absence from the CPI list for 17 years did not mean that Fiji was corruption-free. It meant that there was not enough data available to accurately measure levels of corruption.”

Ms Konrote added that it is reassuring that the new Coalition Government has taken over after 16 repressive years and that many repressive laws are planned for removal. For anti-corruption strategies to be effective, integrity institutions need to be strengthened and democracy processes need to be bolstered.

Social Media

Integrity Fiji’s Elsie Pickering said that on their Facebook post of the CPI some people were commenting that there was a lot of corrupt activity reported, but these was not accurately reported in the CPI score. How could this have happened?

Pickering noted that there are a number of possible reasons for this. Corrupt activity not within the timeframe of this year’s CPI could take a year or more to reflect in the data sources. Some positive developments in controlling public sector corruption might have been captured, balancing out these negative cases. Ms Pickering noted that Fiji’s anti-corruption agency was dynamic and proactive and this has been a very positive factor when compared with Pacific nations that do not have anti-corruption agencies. “We may gripe about FICAC but the reality is that they have worked hard through the years to develop strong anti corruption strategies.”

Executive Director Joseph Veramu said that one positive aspect of this year’s CPI score and ranking for Fiji is that a new Government has come into power that is not authoritarian. ”Government will repeal the draconian Media Act and allow for free speech and assembly amongst other democratic rights.”

Veramu said that the CPI was not just about corruption issues. It also covers a free media, freedom of speech and assembly, human rights, gender rights and a country run on dynamic democratic principles.” All these democratic ideals combine to affirm our integrity institutions and help to curb corruption in Fiji.


Tuesday, December 27, 2022

Whistle-blowing Regional University Vice Chancellor Reinstated in Fiji

 Fijian media reported that Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka had moved quickly to ensure exiled whistle-blowing University of the South Pacific Vice Chancellor, Professor Pal Ahluwalia returned to Fiji and that the $90 million + University grant that was withheld (to pressure him to resign) will be reinstated.

Rabuka will apologise on behalf of the people of Fiji for the way Ahluwalia was treated. He noted that he had promised that his government would bring to an end the injustices suffered by Ahluwalia. He added that prohibition orders against Ahluwalia were unreasonable and inhumane and should never have been made. Rabuka observed that Ahluwalia was exiled by deportation after a dispute with the Fiji government (over his whistle-blowing), and it created a major crisis for the University. Transparency International noted that “Despite the recognition that whistle-blowers are crucial to society, the fight for their rights remains full of hurdles. But there are also wins to celebrate.” Ahluwalia’s re-instatement sends a clear message that whistle-blowers should feel free to report incidences of wrongdoing especially in Government funded entities.

Ahluwalia’s case is not an isolated one. It seems to be widespread and mirrors the toxic culture where whistle-blowers are persecuted for exposing wrongdoing. Transparency International had published a statement “urging all UN member states to end reprisals against whistle-blowers, and to respect, protect, promote and fulfil the human rights of everyone – including those working to promote and defend the rights of other people and to fight and expose corruption.”

The Guardian (21/6/2022) reported on a damning BBC documentary dealing with the United Nation’s mistreatment of whistle-blowers. It noted that once whistle-blowers spoke out, the UN went after them. One whistle-blower, for example, was suddenly accused of solicitation and viewing nude photographs on his phone at work. Yet another has footage of Swiss police entering her flat and refusing to leave: she says the UN had sent them, and had told them Reilly was a suicide risk.

In the case of Ahluwalia, Jyoti Pratibha of the Fiji Sun reported that the Chair of the University’s Audit and Risk Committee noted 33 counts of instances where it is alleged that Ahluwalia did not follow the established procedures. ”Because of the seriousness of the allegations” he was suspended.

One early sign that there were some complications in the allegations brought against Ahluwalia was when the highly respected finance and IT expert, Semi Tukana, resigned abruptly. He had sent his letter of resignation to then Pro-Chancellor Winston Thompson who had appointed him (Tukana) to the investigation committee. Mr Tukana had provided four reasons for resigning. One concern was that “this sub-committee (is) being used as a means to achieving the ultimate aim of terminating the appointment of Professor Pal Ahluwalia as VC at USP.” He also highlighted the “existing public perception of the lack of independence in how the appointment of the members of this committee was arrived at,” and the “non-involvement of the USP Council as a whole.”

The University Council had rescinded the suspension. It “is not persuaded that due process was followed in the suspension of Vice-Chancellor Ahluwalia.”

This led some to question whether there had been elements of vindictiveness in Ahluwalia’s suspension

When Professor Ahluwalia took up his position in 2019, he hit the ground running. Although appointed in November 2018, he formally took up his role in January 2019. Within six weeks of taking office, concerned staff had gone to Ahluwalia with allegations. In April 2019, Ahluwalia sent a paper entitled “Issues, Concerns and Breaches of Past Management and Financial Decisions” alleging wrongdoing by the former Vice Chancellor”. Ahluwalia had made 26 allegations of mismanagement against his predecessor who held office from 2008 to 2018.

BDO Auckland concluded there was a lack of documentary evidence because of the level and or quality of documentation retained by USP. “BDO’s view is that a majority of the decisions investigated were made within the boundaries of the Vice Chancellor’s ordinance. However, when critically analysed, the rationale for many of the decisions taken is unclear.” BDO identified the need for greater oversight, control and management of the HR and payroll functions of the USP.

Transparency International and CLCT Integrity Fiji note that the fight for whistleblowers’ rights has also produced key wins, but for these wins to spark real change and better protection for whistle-blowers, we must continue fighting. Integrity Fiji and its youth network Youths4IntegrityFiji have been unwavering in supporting whistle-blowers like Ahluwalia; choosing him as Pacific Integrity Champion in 2021

Anti-corruption fighters, including whistle-blowers, are increasingly under threat. Supporting them is a core pillar of Integrity Fiji and Transparency International’s work – through legal advice, rapid response, and advocacy for better legal and institutional frameworks. This not only makes a difference for the individuals involved but protects everyone by working towards an environment that allows people to speak out safely against corruption and be heard.

Monday, December 26, 2022

New Fiji Government and what it means for anti-corruption advocacy

 Fiji now has a new Government led by Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka. He replaces Frank Bainimarama’s FijiFirst Party that had been in power for 16 years. 

Bainimarama had instigated a military coup in 2006. At that time, he claimed that he had wanted to “clean up” Fiji from corruption. While his government made many strides on socio-economic development, there were allegations in later years of nepotism in the appointment of his relatives to senior Government positions. His authoritarian democracy stifled local government elections, limited free speech and freedom of assembly. Bainimarama had held democratic elections in 2014 under a new constitution and won by a landslide.

Rabuka the new Prime Minister of the Coalition Government had previously carried out two military coups in 1987. He had also served as the democratically elected prime minister from 1992 to 1999. From Rabuka’s conservative pro-Fijian nationalist image in 1987, he had re-invented himself to become an inclusive statesman advocating for multicultural harmony in Fiji.

Bainimarama’s Government is credited with ratifying the United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) and the setting up of the highly regarded national anti-corruption agency, the Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption. One senior official from one of CLCT Integrity Fiji’s donor partners noted that FICAC is an anti-corruption agency in the Pacific that actually works and is efficient. In the Corruption Perceptions Index 2021 (released in Jan 2022) Fiji scored 55 out of 100 and was ranked 45 out of 180 nations. To be ranked in the top 50 least corrupt nations was commendable.

Rabuka’s political party had stated in their manifesto that they would phase out FICAC and have its functions undertaken by the Fiji Police Force or the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions. To do this, Rabuka would need to amend the Constitution. There are indications that he will not phase out FICAC but review its modus operandi.


(r to l) Elsie Pickering, Josa (Amania!) Grace Konrote, Qalo Lesinawai and Rusula Cavalevu

Integrity Fiji Youth and Community Officer Grace Konrote said that at the outset, the NGO leaders realised that under the repressive Fiji Media Act, they had to be courageous and speak out even if that meant spending time in a police cell or hauled off to prison.

“We either spoke out or joined a less assertive group like say knitting or mat weaving. Our strategy was to be diplomatic and constructive in our advocacy.” Their testing moment came in early 2021 when the Bainimarama Government planned to introduce the Draft Police Bill. The Draft Bill proposed that a police officer should be allowed to seize, without warrant, any electronic storage device found in any crime scene. It would be lawful for any police officer to use reasonable force on any person who failed to comply. There were provisions to deploy police as soldiers subjected to military law during emergency situations.

https://www.fijivillage.com/news/Youth-for-Integrity-welcomes-PMs-comments-that-Draft-Police-Bill-will-not-go-in-its-current-form-to-Parliament-4rf5x8/

Qalo Lesinawai a part time event organiser for Integrity Fiji said that with the new Rabuka Government, they hoped that the oppressive Fiji Media Act would be repealed. This would allow them to do their anti-corruption advocacy without fear.

Elsie Pickering another part time event organiser said that the other issue they had to get used to were trolls who hounded them on social media. “We are not saying that they were sympathisers of the previous Government. We just had to develop thick skins and not lose sight of the reason our NGO was created and that is to support anti-corruption advocacy.”

What does the future hold?

The current political situation is still an unfolding narrative. The current government has a very slim majority. While there is hope that it will last the full 4 years, we must anticipate that the situation is fluid and can change. Integrity Fiji remains hopeful as the new coalition government has publicly stated that they will put more focus and attention on good governance which is a pre-condition for anti-corruption work in any society.

https://fijisun.com.fj/2022/12/26/good-governance-top-priority-kamikamica/?fbclid=IwAR3VI16CRsOlYJ5ud9EWOo9vHdRHStn8NnC-MHF4kC_QQ6R9l6iFsmgdEOU

Chairperson Jofiliti Veikoso acknowledged the great support Integrity Fiji had received from its partners in the Fiji National University, the anti-corruption agency FICAC, the Ministry of Economy’s Procurement Office, UN agencies, local embassies and high commissions, other NGOs and civil society. “Democracy can be cumbersome and long winded. However, we cannot go back to the old ways. For anti-corruption advocacy to thrive, we need lots of democracy in Fiji!”

Friday, November 25, 2022

Talanoa with the Fiji Supervisor of Elections – Lead Up to 2022 General Election

 Sakeo Moce

“SoE exhorted youth leaders to encourage their friends and family to cast their votes during election day.”
On the 22nd of November 2022, Youths4IntegrityFiji, the youth network of Integrity Fiji organised a talanoa session with the Fiji Supervisor of Elections Mr Mohammed Saneem. The talanoa was to learn about the electoral processes and how the Fiji Election Office will expedite the process of the General Election 2022.
Sakeo Moce (Integrity Fiji Board Secretary) pictured with Supervisor of Elections Mohammed Saneem
 Overall, the session was very informative and insightful. We had initially set up the conference room at Tanoa Plaza International Hotel in a classroom structure but Mr Saneem suggested that we arrange the chairs close to each other and in a round-table discussion format. I thought this was cool as it allowed us to sit with him and listen to his Talanoa.

Talanoa Begins

Mr Saneem started the Talanoa by highlighting the current social cultural and socio economic context in Fiji, the role of governments in addressing the needs of the people, and some of the good progress and tangible changes that he observed overtime from when he was young to the Fiji of today. He then briefly talked about the National General Election and its role in effecting change in society and how it’s important for young people to participate in the whole process.

He said that youths can be candidates, polling agents, managing polling venues and most importantly youths needed to cast their vote. He mentioned that the youngest candidate is 21 years old.

He highlighted the role and the importance of youth to challenge the norms in society where some people always look at young people as immature, lack the experience and knowledge but overlooked the fact that young people are the torch bearers of the future, bring with them the energy, the excitement, dedication, willingness and the new ways of thinking to contribute positively to the development of society through the electoral process and beyond.

Saneem asked the youth leaders if they can stop being the biggest cheer leaders but advocate for their engagement in leadership position. He highlighted that the youngest polling venue manager in this year general election is an 18 years old individual who had participated well during the series of training they conducted Fiji.

He highlighted that some political parties objected to this saying that 18 years old is too young and should not be managing polling booths, to which he replied 18 years old is capable of doing and achieving anything provided they are trained and supported well.

SOE also highlighted and explained very briefly the electoral process, starting from voter registration, how the voting booth will be set up, how voting will take place, how the ballot papers will be managed before and after it has been used, how it will be stored, how voting and ballot papers will be monitored, how it will be counted, the role of polling agents and observers and how election results will be finalised and announced. All these information according to him is available in FEO website.

He also shared his concerns about the lack of interest from people to cast their votes during elections. He believed that some people registered with their office just for the sake of getting the voter ID cards and not necessarily to use it for voting during election day. He shared stories of a Bouncer from a Night Club in Suva who came to him with an envelope full of Fiji Voter ID card belonging to some young people who forgot to collect it from the Night Club Bouncer when they checked in. He mentioned that another person came to him with a box of voter ID card because people forgot to collect it after being served at the counter.

He also highlighted that out of the 9,000 plus people registered from overseas, only 400+ have applied for postal voting.

SOE responses to some our questions

If there is a Natural Disaster (God Forbid) then adjustments to the Fiji General Election may  happen and there are various factors such as severity of the natural disasters, recovery time etc will need to be considered in making any decisions in response to a crisis.

When asked about what could be some of the reasons for low voter turnout – he said that we just have to wait after the elections to learn about the reasons from the public about the electoral process. He said that in order for people to trust the process, political parties need to accept the final election results when it comes out. This spurred a lot of discussion and the youth leaders continued to be so inquisitive to learn about what can be done to address the low turnout that seems to be the trend in Fiji Elections. 

The SOE requested everyone to share one or two matters about what motivates them to go and cast their votes during election. Several young people spoke their minds and talked about things like employment opportunities, educations etc and Mr Saneem spoke about the benefits of voting and he gave an example of how he wrote a letter to the SDL government in 2006 requesting if the prize of "normal" meal in McDonalds can be reduced, and in that year, the Fiji Government actually reduced the prize of a meal serve from $7+ to $5+.

In my opinion, all the possible reasons given by the people as to why they don’t want to vote is valid, as they are sharing it from their owned lived experience. In order to address this, firstly, we need to organise this raw data into a body of knowledge through a proper and robust methodology, otherwise known as doing research about it, to investigate the factors influencing low turnout and the predisposing factors that influence the self-efficacy of the electorate in order to turn up and cast their votes during elections. Secondly, we need to organise the knowledge together to develop evidence-based strategies that would address this underlying issue of low turnout and the root causes through the construction of Theory of Change. This will also allow us to identify the critical assumptions that contributes to the success of the interventions, the risk that would hinder its success and also the partners and stakeholders that needs to work together to change the situation in terms of making strategic interventions that would increase the participation rate during the election day(s). In fact, I shared this with a friend who also attended this talanoa.

When asked about what’s the issue with the “Rock the Vote Campaign”, - he mentioned that under the Fiji campaign law no one is to engage in activities that bribe people to vote for them. It is illegal.

He added that Rock the Vote or Bring the Vote campaign is the US concept and it usually organised by Civil Society Organisations. He mentioned that CSO should be able to implement the concept in Fiji, but provided that apply for approval first from FEO just to make sure that everything about the program and/or project is in conformity to the current electoral laws of Fiji. He plead with the youths to encourage their friends and family to cast their votes during election.

Saneem described and explained the process of voting and what happens at different stages. He encouraged people to be observers and polling agents from their political parties to assist and observe the whole process. He highlighted that it’s important for polling agents and observers to be trained so that they know how to observe the process and don’t have to make unnecessary remarks. He also highlighted that he organised a similar talanoa with political parties to allow them to have accurate information about the whole electoral process.

We would have asked a lot of questions but the time was so short and we had to end the talanoa, have a group picture and enjoyed finger foods and network with everyone presents during the talanoa.

Green Skills for Youth: Towards a Sustainable World of Integrity

Matereti Sarasau Sukanaivalu 1 Timothy 4:12 “ Let no man despise thy youth ; but be thou an example of the believers, in word , in conversa...